Updated September 22, 2026.

Finance that connects daily operations with the next strategic decision

A company can report a profit and still struggle to meet payroll, fund inventory or satisfy a lender. A group can grow in three countries while its owners remain unable to see consolidated profitability. And an attractive business can enter an investment round without being able to explain the difference between accounting earnings and cash generation. CFO services address these gaps by bringing accounting, planning, treasury and transaction preparation into one management process.

Lev Partners’ outsourced CFO and CFO-as-a-service work covers cash flow management, budgeting, financial reporting and the coordination needed to turn those outputs into decisions. Our team has hands-on experience with monthly close, bank reconciliations, consolidation and management reporting using QuickBooks and Xero data. The engagement is designed around the company’s operating model, existing finance team and priorities, rather than a standard dashboard delivered without explanation.

Reading the examples: All figures below are illustrative, invented for this article and expressed in USD thousands unless stated otherwise. They are not client results, software screenshots or promised outcomes. They show how a reporting package can connect performance, liquidity and management action.

1. A single performance view for a U.S., UK and Turkish group

Consider a group with a U.S. commercial entity, a UK sales subsidiary and a Turkish operating company. Each entity needs reliable local books, but management also needs a consistent group view. Simply adding three profit-and-loss reports can overstate revenue and profit when one group company sells to another. Different account names, reporting periods and currency treatments introduce further inconsistencies.

We start with a common reporting chart of accounts and a mapping from each local ledger. Revenue, direct costs, payroll, operating expenses and balance-sheet accounts are assigned consistent definitions. Intercompany balances are matched before consolidation; mismatches are investigated rather than hidden in a balancing line. Local reporting obligations remain separate from the management consolidation.

In the example, entity revenue totals 2,000. Removing 200 of intercompany sales leaves group revenue of 1,800. Entity EBITDA totals 285; eliminating 69 of intercompany profit still embedded in inventory reduces consolidated EBITDA to 216. The matching intercompany revenue and cost elimination has no net EBITDA effect in this simplified example. Other adjustments would be assessed separately in a real consolidation.

The management question: Revenue is 10% below the 2,000 budget, while EBITDA margin is 12%. Which customers, products and countries explain the gap? Entity totals provide a starting point; customer and product profitability reveal where pricing, delivery costs or discounting require action.

The reporting pack should also show cash by entity and currency, overdue receivables, inventory, debt and intercompany balances. Group cash is not automatically transferable between legal entities. Restrictions, tax consequences and funding arrangements must be understood before assuming one company can finance another. Currency translation follows the applicable reporting framework and a documented rate policy; the example uses already-translated USD amounts, not current exchange rates.

2. A rolling 13-week cash forecast that exposes the funding date

A monthly income statement will not tell management whether a large tax payment and supplier shipment fall in the same week. A direct cash forecast starts from reconciled bank balances and schedules actual receipts and payments by expected date. Customer invoices, payroll, supplier commitments, taxes, capital expenditure and debt service are connected to owners and supporting evidence.

The forecast rolls forward weekly. Actual collections replace estimates; overdue receipts are reassessed with the commercial team; new commitments are added before purchase orders are approved. A confidence level can distinguish confirmed receipts from assumptions. An unapproved loan or unsigned equity round must not appear as available cash in the committed case.

In week seven, opening cash of 190 plus collections of 300, less operating payments of 280 and investment/debt payments of 70, leaves 140. Against a minimum cash target of 250, management faces a 110 buffer shortfall. This is a shortfall against the chosen operating buffer, not a negative bank balance.

The response might combine accelerated collection of specific invoices, rescheduling non-essential capital expenditure and securing a committed facility. Each action needs a responsible person, completion date and revised cash impact. A separate downside forecast should test delayed collections and weaker sales. A group forecast then identifies whether the shortfall occurs in the entity that can actually access the proposed funding.

3. Budgeting and projections built from operating drivers

A useful budget is more than last year’s revenue plus a growth percentage. For a manufacturer, the model may start with production capacity, order intake, utilisation, selling price, raw-material costs and inventory days. For a service company, billable headcount, utilisation, fee rates and collection terms may matter more. A recurring-revenue business needs a different set of retention, acquisition and gross-margin drivers.

We connect these assumptions to an integrated income statement, balance sheet and cash flow forecast. A 12-month operating budget can sit within a 24-month outlook, with the near term modelled in more detail. Hiring dates, capex, working capital and financing assumptions must move consistently across the statements. Scenario analysis shows the effect of weaker demand, slower collections or a delayed investment round before management commits spending.

The waterfall explains an 84 EBITDA shortfall: volume reduces profit by 60, price and mix by 20, and input costs by 18, partly offset by 14 of operating-cost savings. These illustrative contributions reconcile the budget of 300 to actual EBITDA of 216. In practice, the calculation method must avoid counting the same effect twice.

The scenario matrix is a separate forward-looking annual view. Its base case of 21,600 revenue and a 12% margin gives EBITDA of 2,592. A downside case combines 10% lower revenue with an 8% margin; the resulting EBITDA is 1,555.2. The point is not to predict a single outcome precisely, but to identify the cash, hiring and financing decisions that change under each case. Seasonality and working capital still need to be modelled; annual EBITDA alone does not determine funding needs.

4. A monthly close that management and investors can rely on

Professional reporting begins before a chart is drawn. Bank accounts must reconcile; receivables and payables must agree to their ledgers; accruals, prepayments, payroll, fixed assets and inventory need review. Revenue and costs should be recorded in the correct periods. Unexplained suspense balances and duplicate transactions should have assigned resolution owners.

For a QuickBooks-based entity, a practical workflow can connect bank reconciliation, account coding, receivables aging and departmental reporting to a controlled monthly pack. For a Xero-based entity, the same discipline applies to reconciliation, tracking categories, accrual review and reporting exports. Lev’s experience covers these tasks as well as using the resulting data for consolidation and management reporting. These are descriptions of work performed by the team, not claims of vendor certification.

A group using both systems does not necessarily need an immediate software migration. Consistent mappings, controlled data extraction and a suitable reporting layer may solve the management problem first. Native consolidation capabilities depend on the product and subscription; Intuit Enterprise Suite, for example, has specific multi-company reporting tools. A Xero-based consolidation may require an appropriate reporting application or a controlled consolidation model.

An illustrative close calendar assigns reconciliations and cutoff checks to the first three working days, entity review and intercompany matching to days four and five, and consolidation and management review to days six through eight. The timetable must reflect transaction volume, system quality and the local team’s capacity. Accounting reviews and audit preparation support reliable records; they do not replace an independent statutory audit where required.

5. Financing preparation and a more effective bank dialogue

A financing request is stronger when it explains the amount, timing, use of funds and repayment source. The CFO workstream brings together historical financials, management accounts, forecasts, working-capital analysis, debt schedules, security information and downside scenarios. It also clarifies whether the need is a seasonal cash gap, an investment programme or a structural capital shortfall.

Short-term working-capital requirements, long-lived equipment and acquisition funding call for different structures. Management should compare maturity, currency, amortisation, total cost, collateral and covenants, rather than only the headline interest rate. For a business earning and borrowing in different currencies, the effect of exchange-rate movements deserves explicit analysis.

Lev can support preparation of lender materials and financial discussions, track requests and keep the forecast consistent with proposed terms. Covenant calculations should use the definitions in the relevant agreement. Facility availability, approval and pricing remain lender decisions; a forecast should not treat a potential facility as secured financing.

6. Where CFO services, fundraising and M&A meet

Investors and buyers need to understand the quality and repeatability of earnings, not just the top-line growth story. Consistent monthly reporting makes it easier to explain revenue concentration, gross margin, normalised EBITDA, cash conversion and net debt. An investment-round model should connect the requested capital to milestones: capacity, customer acquisition, hiring or product development, with a clear use-of-funds schedule and downside runway.

For a sale process, the same finance foundation supports the information memorandum, data room and financial due diligence. Working-capital definitions, related-party balances and one-off costs should be addressed early. An adjustment to EBITDA requires evidence and a clear rationale; it is not simply an opportunity to remove inconvenient costs.

After an acquisition, the CFO workstream helps align reporting definitions, integrate forecasts, track integration costs and measure synergies against an agreed baseline. This connection between ongoing finance operations and transaction preparation is why CFO support should start before a formal fundraising or sale timetable becomes urgent.

7. What a practical CFO engagement delivers

The initial diagnostic reviews ledger quality, reporting gaps, liquidity, systems and management priorities. The first deliverables are selected for decision value: a reconciled cash position, a rolling cash forecast, an agreed close calendar and a consistent management pack. Subsequent work adds driver-based budgets, scenarios, consolidation and lender or investor preparation as required.

• Weekly: cash forecast, collections priorities and near-term funding decisions.

• Monthly: financial close, consolidated reporting, budget variances and an action register.

• Quarterly: refreshed projections, capital-allocation review and financing priorities.

• Transaction milestones: investor materials, data-room support and coordination with relevant advisers.

Every report should end with the decision, financial impact, owner and deadline. The engagement scope sets responsibilities between Lev, management, the internal accounting team and specialist advisers. The aim is a finance function that supports day-to-day control and makes the next strategic step easier to evaluate.

Discuss your finance priorities with Cenk Sönmezyalçın

Cenk Sönmezyalçın — Board Advisor, Lev Partners. Cenk brings a corporate CFO perspective to Lev’s CFO advisory work. At Lev, he is the service contact for discussing management reporting, cash planning and the finance priorities described in this article.

Need a clearer view of group performance or your next funding requirement? Contact us today. Tell us which countries your companies operate in, which accounting systems you use and which financial decisions you need to support.

Contact Lev Partners about CFO services →

Explore our CFO services

References: Intuit consolidated reporting documentation.